The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
If you do not depend on a single place, head or pattern, you are hard to read and cannot be hit with a single blow.
- It does not say
- That structure is bad. What it means is freedom of shape with clarity at the core.
- It does not say
- That formless entities can do everything. They struggle to negotiate, assign responsibility and lock in their gains.
- It also says
- Over time, new centers emerge in formless systems, and with them new points of attack.
The explanationThe principle works externally and internally.
The principle works externally and internally.
Externally, the opponent does not know where to attack, and when it does attack, it hits only part of you. Internally, it creates adaptability.
- Formlessness does not mean arbitrariness.
- Water remains water even when it changes its shape.
- If you give up your core, you are not formless but dissolved.
What is your core, the part that stays, and which form could you let go of?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 2 when you overlook it
- Your team keeps working when you are out.
- Knowledge and decisions lie with several people.
- Everyone can say what holds at the core, even when processes change.
- Everything runs through you, or through one supplier, one location, one system; if that point fails, everything stops.
- Or the team is so loose that nobody decides anymore and nobody signs.
The backgroundTradition T2 Eastern Strategy
- 5th c. BCOriginSun Tzu
Chapter 6
- 2006SupplementedOri Brafman and Rod A. Beckstrom
The Starfish and the Spider
- 2017SupplementedZeynep Tufekci
Twitter and Tear Gas
- Tradition T2TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From the sixth chapter of “The Art of War,” which is attributed to Sun Tzu (China, around the 5th century BC), with the image of water that the Tao Te Ching, attributed to Laozi, also uses. Supplemented by Bruce Lee, by “The Starfish and the Spider” by Ori Brafman and Rod A. Beckstrom (2006) and by Zeynep Tufekci’s objections in “Twitter and Tear Gas” (2017).
The research3 sources: 2 case studies, 1 classic · 2006–2017 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
One classic and two collections of cases; that formless organizations survive attacks better has not been measured, and one of the sources mainly shows the limit.
- 2006Ori Brafman and Rod A. Beckstrom
“The Starfish and the Spider”: decentralized organizations are hard to destroy; examples range from file-sharing networks on the internet to Alcoholics Anonymous.
- 2017Zeynep Tufekci
“Twitter and Tear Gas”: networked protest movements, including those of the Arab Spring, Occupy and Gezi Park, grow quickly and find it hard to negotiate goals and to make their gains last.
- Formlessness protects you against an opponent who is looking for a center.
- It does little against an opponent who changes the rules for everyone; in Hong Kong, the 2020 national security law showed this limit.
- Over time, new centers emerge in formless systems, and with them new points of attack.
- At the key passage, Lionel Giles speaks of concealing your dispositions, not of formlessness; the reading “no form” follows other translations.
Read more: what research shows
The principle comes from the sixth chapter of “The Art of War,” which is attributed to Sun Tzu. There, the highest level of disposing your forces is to show no recognizable form; Lionel Giles renders the passage as “the highest pitch you can attain is to conceal them.” Just as water has no constant shape, there are no constant conditions in war. Ori Brafman and Rod A. Beckstrom describe decentralized organizations with the image of the starfish: cut off an arm and it grows back, while a spider without a head dies. Zeynep Tufekci shows the limit in networked protest movements, including Occupy Wall Street and the protests in Istanbul’s Gezi Park. They grow quickly but often fail to negotiate goals and to make their gains last. Both books work with cases, not with measurements.
The related principles22 Mission Command · 29 Emptiness and Fullness · 89 Antifragility · 92 The Soft Overcomes the Hard
To go deeper, see 29 Emptiness and Fullness (from the same chapter: if you are formless, you flow to where the opponent is empty) and 22 Mission Command (distributed command does not depend on a single head)
89 Antifragility goes one step further: formless systems can grow from blows
92 The Soft Overcomes the Hard shares the image of water
Read more: the full text
To go deeper, see 29 Emptiness and Fullness (from the same chapter: if you are formless, you flow to where the opponent is empty) and 22 Mission Command (distributed command does not depend on a single head). 89 Antifragility goes one step further: formless systems can grow from blows. 92 The Soft Overcomes the Hard shares the image of water.
The action steps5 action steps: Find the points where everything depends on one person, one place or one supplier.
Find the points where everything depends on one person, one place or one supplier.
Share knowledge and responsibility so that at least two people can handle every important task.
- Put the core into words: three or four sentences that hold no matter how processes change.
Decide who may make binding decisions and sign, even when the work is shared.
After every disruption, check where new centers have formed and whether you want them.
The reflection questions3 questions: What comes to a standstill if you are out for three weeks?
- What comes to a standstill if you are out for three weeks?
- Which sentences describe the core of your team, no matter how processes change?
- Who in your team may make binding decisions when the work is shared?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- A rigid frame of teal lines stands in the middle
- A mist-blue stroke hits it, and it breaks
- Afterward, in its place, lies a surface of golden dots that scatters at the next hit, gathers again in several places and finally fills round, angular and narrow frames
How the principle shows up in practice
Bitcoin, 2009
The network created under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto has no headquarters, no boss and no server, so neither its inventor’s disappearance nor a ban in China could stop it.
Hong Kong, 2019
The protesters follow Bruce Lee’s motto “Be water,” organize without leaders and keep regrouping elsewhere, until the 2020 security law shows the limit of this tactic.
Yavne, around AD 70
According to tradition, Yohanan ben Zakkai secures Yavne and its scholars before the Temple is destroyed. There Judaism is given a new shape around the Torah, prayer and acts of loving-kindness, which can be lived anywhere.
What does your team depend on?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 4: Deception and Indirection
Guiding question: How do you reach your goal without charging head-on?
Stage 3 of 5: Choose the path
- TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin