The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
Where leaders and their people want the same thing and trust one another, people give more than is asked of them, even when nobody is checking.
- It does not say
- That unity rules out dissent. Where criticism counts as betrayal, unity has turned into enforced conformity.
- It does not say
- That unity alone is enough. Without a viable foundation, even the best harmony will not carry you far.
- It also says
- Unity has to be earned. If you hand out burdens and carry none yourself, you lose it.
The explanationUnity cannot be proclaimed; it has to be earned.
- Unity cannot be proclaimed; it has to be earned.
- If you keep your own advantages while others are asked to do without, you lose it.
- And unity is not enforced conformity: it can withstand criticism because it rests on trust, not on fear.
Do your people want what you want, and do they trust that you want it for them, too?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 3 when you overlook it
- You speak openly about the situation, even when it is bad.
- You share the burdens when others are asked to do without.
- In a crisis, people stay and bring their own ideas.
- You announce unity instead of living it.
- You treat criticism as disloyalty.
- Nothing happens unless you order it or pay for it.
The backgroundFrom the first chapter of “The Art of War,” attributed to Sun Tzu (probably 5th or 4th century BC). · T2 Eastern Strategy
- 5th/4th c. BCOriginSun Tzu
The Art of War,
- 1978SupplementedJames MacGregor Burns
Leadership
- 2011SupplementedS. Alexander Haslam, Stephen D. Reicher and Michael J. Platow
The New Psychology of Leadership
- Tradition T2TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From the first chapter of “The Art of War,” attributed to Sun Tzu (probably 5th or 4th century BC). Supplemented by James MacGregor Burns (1978) and by S. Alexander Haslam, Stephen D. Reicher and Michael J. Platow (2011).
The research4 sources: 1 classic, 1 theory, 1 review, 1 case study · 1972–2011 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
The social psychology of leadership supports the idea that people are more likely to follow those who stand for the shared group; the comparison with orders and money is a conclusion drawn from the classic.
- 1972Irving L. Janis
“Victims of Groupthink”: very close-knit groups put pressure on doubters, censor themselves and take silence for agreement.
- 1978James MacGregor Burns
“Leadership”: distinguishes transactional from transforming leadership; the latter starts from the convictions, needs and values of those who are led.
- 2011S. Alexander Haslam, Stephen D. Reicher and Michael J. Platow
“The New Psychology of Leadership”: leadership is effective when it is seen as part of the group and stands up for the group’s interests; it creates and embodies a shared identity.
- Unity can also be mobilized for the wrong goals.
- Propaganda creates a united front without resting on trust.
- Too much unity leads to groupthink, as Irving L. Janis described in his studies of foreign-policy fiascoes: doubts are suppressed, and mistakes are no longer seen.
- Unity does not replace a viable foundation; Sun Tzu names the Dao as the first of five factors, not as the only one.
- Leadership research supports followership, not its superiority over orders or money.
Read more: what research shows
In the first chapter of “The Art of War,” Sun Tzu names five factors to be examined before any war. The first is the Dao, which Lionel Giles translates as the “Moral Law”: it “causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler,” so that they follow him undismayed by any danger. When assessing the situation, Sun Tzu first asks which of the two rulers has it. In 1978, James MacGregor Burns described transforming leadership, which starts from the convictions, needs and values of those who are led. S. Alexander Haslam, Stephen D. Reicher and Michael J. Platow show that leadership is effective when it is seen as “one of us” and stands up for the shared group. None of the sources has measured whether this creates a strength that neither orders nor money can replace.
The related principles46 Moral Forces · 49 Fear and Love · 54 Soft Power · 55 Strategic Narrative
To go deeper, see 54 Soft Power (agreement through example and attraction instead of mere obedience) and 55 Strategic Narrative (the shared story that connects leaders and people)
46 Moral Forces shows what grows out of this unity
49 Fear and Love asks what followership rests on
Read more: the full text
To go deeper, see 54 Soft Power (agreement through example and attraction instead of mere obedience) and 55 Strategic Narrative (the shared story that connects leaders and people). 46 Moral Forces shows what grows out of this unity; 49 Fear and Love asks what followership rests on.
The action steps5 action steps: Ask your people what matters to them about the shared task, and put it into your own words.
Ask your people what matters to them about the shared task, and put it into your own words.
Tell the truth about the situation before others tell it.
- Share burdens visibly. When others are asked to do without, do without first.
- Invite dissent explicitly and thank people for it. Where nobody disagrees, check whether it is agreement or fear that keeps silent.
- Keep your promises, especially the small ones. Trust grows out of experience, not announcements.
The reflection questions3 questions: How can you tell whether your people share your goals or merely carry them out?
- How can you tell whether your people share your goals or merely carry them out?
- What advantage are you holding on to while you expect others to do without?
- When did someone last openly disagree with you, and how did you react?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- A golden arc glides on a stream of many teal dots, all flowing in the same direction
- When the arc turns against the current, the dots are thrown into mist-blue eddies
- Only when a golden dot moves from the arc into the stream and the direction is realigned does everything glide calmly again
How the principle shows up in practice
John Paul II in Poland, 1979
Millions come to the pope’s Masses, and the country experiences the unity of church and people while the state is left out. A little over a year later, Solidarity is born.
Aaron Feuerstein and Malden Mills
After the 1995 fire, the owner keeps paying his roughly 3,000 employees. This creates a deep bond but does not save the company in the long run.
Winston Churchill in 1940
Churchill prevails in the cabinet against negotiations and puts into words what many Britons feel. Leaders and people bear a summer of danger together.
Do your people want what you want?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 7: People, Morale and Power
Guiding question: What moves people to go along or to resist?
Stage 4 of 5: Act with others
- TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
- Related principles
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin