The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
If you change your opponent’s picture, you change their decisions. That way you shift the balance of forces at the decisive point without having more yourself.
- It does not say
- That deception is allowed toward people whose trust you need. There it is not strategy but a breach of trust, often fraud.
- It does not say
- That the ruse is already the victory. It creates an advantage that you still have to exploit afterward.
- It also says
- Every deception has an expiration date. The longer it has to hold, the more expensive and risky it becomes.
The explanationThe principle comes from war and applies only where there is genuine opposition.
- The principle comes from war and applies only where there is genuine opposition.
- Holding back in competition is legitimate.
- But if you deceive employees, customers, investors or your own family, you may win a moment and lose the trust on which everything else rests.
Who is really your opponent here, and what picture do they have of you?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 3 when you overlook it
- You hold back plans from competitors until they are final.
- In negotiations, you do not reveal your limit.
- With your team and your customers, you are straight about how things stand.
- You announce every step, and the competition adjusts to it.
- Or you carry the ruse over into relationships and describe the situation to your team as better than it is.
- After that, no one quite believes you anymore.
The backgroundTradition T2 Eastern Strategy
- 6th/5th c. BCOriginSun Tzu
Chapter 1
- 1832SupplementedCarl von Clausewitz
On War
- 1969SupplementedBarton Whaley
Stratagem
- Tradition T2TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From the first chapter of “The Art of War,” attributed to Sun Tzu (Sun Wu, 6th or 5th century BC); known in Europe through the translations by Jean Joseph Marie Amiot (1772) and Lionel Giles (1910). Supplemented by Barton Whaley’s study “Stratagem” (1969) and the objection raised by Carl von Clausewitz in “On War” (1832).
The research3 sources: 2 classics, 1 case study · 1832–1969 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
A classic and a historical case study support the link between deception and surprise; none of the sources measures how often deception works, and Carl von Clausewitz qualifies it.
- 1969Barton Whaley
“Stratagem: Deception and Surprise in War”: more than 100 cases from military history; surprise and deliberate deception are closely linked.
- The principle applies only toward genuine opponents.
- Toward partners, customers and employees, deception is not strategy but a breach of trust.
- Carl von Clausewitz considers large-scale deceptions costly because they tie up forces.
- The sources do not examine whether deception works in business competition the way it does in war.
Read more: what research shows
The principle is a classic, not a measured regularity. In “The Art of War,” attributed to Sun Tzu, the first chapter says that all warfare is based on deception: when able to attack, you must seem unable; when near, you must seem far away. In his study “Stratagem,” Barton Whaley compared more than 100 cases from military history and described a close link between deliberate deception and surprise. Carl von Clausewitz counters: cunning, he argues, has little room in strategy. Feints cost time and forces, and it is dangerous to use substantial forces for a long time merely for show. Cunning, he says, is more accessible to the weaker side. Psychology explains why deception succeeds so often: people look for confirmation of what they expect. The sources do not name a specific study on this.
The related principles17 Foreknowledge · 28 The Direct and the Indirect · 32 Surprise · 33 Art of Stratagems
To go deeper, see 32 Surprise (deception is the most common path to it) and 33 Art of Stratagems (elaborated patterns of cunning)
28 The Direct and the Indirect shows how the visible force deceives about the real intention
17 Foreknowledge protects you from being deceived yourself
Read more: the full text
To go deeper, see 32 Surprise (deception is the most common path to it) and 33 Art of Stratagems (elaborated patterns of cunning); 28 The Direct and the Indirect shows how the visible force deceives about the real intention. 17 Foreknowledge protects you from being deceived yourself.
The action steps5 action steps: Distinguish clearly who is an opponent in this situation and who is a partner.
- Distinguish clearly who is an opponent in this situation and who is a partner. Deception is an option only toward opponents, and even there only within the bounds of law and decency.
Ask yourself what picture the competition has of you and what decisions it derives from that picture.
- Hold back what others do not need to know: your timetable, your limit, your next step. Holding back is usually enough; you will rarely need active misrepresentation.
- Count the cost: How much strength does a deception tie up, and how long does it have to hold?
- Check yourself from the other side too: Which clues do you believe because they fit your expectations? Ask someone for a dissenting view.
The reflection questions3 questions: Who in your world is really an opponent, and toward whom do you need trust?
- Who in your world is really an opponent, and toward whom do you need trust?
- What picture does your most important competitor have of you, and what do they do because of it?
- Which clue did you last believe only because it fit your expectations?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- A mist-blue cone of light glides over a field of dots and, in the upper part, makes a dense teal cluster of shadows appear, while the real dots stand small and pale below
- The dots of the other side move toward the shadow, a gate opens below, and a golden line of dots passes through
How the principle shows up in practice
Operation Mincemeat
In 1943, British intelligence officers let a corpse carrying forged letters drift off Spain, and the German leadership reinforces Greece instead of Sicily. Good deception lets the opponent find for themselves what they are meant to believe.
Japan’s hidden Christians
Under the ban imposed in 1614, believers disguise Mary as Kannon and preserve their faith for more than two centuries. Deception can protect the weak, but it also changes those who practice it.
Theranos
Elizabeth Holmes deceives investors, partners and patients about a technology that does not work. The counterexample shows that deceiving those whose trust you build on ends in collapse.
What picture do you project?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 4: Deception and Indirection
Guiding question: How do you reach your goal without charging head-on?
Stage 3 of 5: Choose the path
- TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
- Related principles
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin