The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
Strategy is revealed not only in the plan but also in the pattern of what you actually do. If you see this pattern, you can learn from it.
- It does not say
- That you can do without planning. Without a mission, values and capabilities, you lack the yardstick against which to test patterns.
- It does not say
- That every impulse is a pattern. If you follow every whim and call it learning, you are mistaking restlessness for strategy.
- It also says
- Inventing in hindsight a plan that never existed leads to the wrong lessons for the future.
The explanationNo one can fully foresee the future.
No one can fully foresee the future.
Customers, people and circumstances react differently than expected, and often the people at the edges of an organization know sooner than its leaders what works.
Good leadership recognizes such patterns, tests them against its mission and turns the viable ones into its deliberate course. It is also worth looking at patterns that do harm: in families, habits that no one ever decided on shape life together, for better or worse.
What do your actual actions reveal, and have you noticed it yet?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 3 when you overlook it
- You regularly compare the plan with what you actually do.
- You ask people close to customers and to the work what is going better than expected.
- You make proven patterns binding and deliberately end others.
- You treat everything unexpected as a disruption of the plan.
- Or you stop planning altogether and follow every impulse.
- After the fact, you present successes as the result of a plan that never existed.
The backgroundFrom the article “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent” by Henry Mintzberg and James A. Waters (1985). · T6 Business Strategy
- 1985OriginHenry Mintzberg and James A. Waters
Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent
- 1987SupplementedHenry Mintzberg
Crafting Strategy
- Tradition T6TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From the article “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent” by Henry Mintzberg and James A. Waters (1985). Supplemented by Henry Mintzberg’s “Crafting Strategy” (1987) and the debate about Honda’s success in the United States.
The research3 sources: 2 theories, 1 case study · 1984–1987 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
The distinction is conceptually well developed and derived from cases; the sources do not measure whether recognizing patterns leads to better results, and the flagship example, Honda, is disputed.
- 1984Richard T. Pascale
Honda’s success in the United States as the result of mistakes and rapid learning, contrary to the Boston Consulting Group’s interpretation of it as planned.
- 1985Henry Mintzberg and James A. Waters
“Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent”: a spectrum from purely deliberate to purely emergent; in between, for example, planned, entrepreneurial, ideological and umbrella strategies.
- 1987Henry Mintzberg
“Crafting Strategy”: strategy emerges the way it does for a potter, through working with the material.
- Emergent strategy does not replace direction.
- In hindsight, it is hard to separate what was luck, what was judgment and what was plan; even the Honda case is still interpreted in different ways today.
- Where mistakes are very costly, for example in matters of safety or large investments, careful planning often remains indispensable.
- That recognizing patterns in time leads to better learning is plausible but has not been measured.
Read more: what research shows
In 1985, Henry Mintzberg and James A. Waters described deliberate and emergent strategies as the two ends of a spectrum. Real strategies lie in between, and the authors place planned, entrepreneurial, ideological and umbrella strategies, among others, in this range. In an umbrella strategy, leadership sets the framework, and the details emerge along the way. In 1987, Henry Mintzberg spread the idea with the image of a potter who arrives at new forms while working with the clay. The principle became widely known through the dispute over Honda’s success in the United States: in 1975, the Boston Consulting Group explained it as a deliberate offensive, while in 1984 Richard T. Pascale explained it as the result of mistakes and rapid learning. Igor Ansoff defended deliberate planning against Henry Mintzberg.
The related principles19 Fog of Uncertainty · 21 Plan and Adaptation · 22 Mission Command · 79 Exploration and Exploitation
To go deeper, see 21 Plan and Adaptation (a plan combined with the willingness to change it along the way) and 22 Mission Command (setting the objective and framework creates room for useful patterns from below)
19 Fog of Uncertainty explains why part of every strategy emerges only in action
79 Exploration and Exploitation shows where emergent patterns often come from: from exploration that was allowed to happen
Read more: the full text
To go deeper, see 21 Plan and Adaptation (a plan combined with the willingness to change it along the way) and 22 Mission Command (setting the objective and framework creates room for useful patterns from below); 19 Fog of Uncertainty explains why part of every strategy emerges only in action. 79 Exploration and Exploitation shows where emergent patterns often come from: from exploration that was allowed to happen.
The action steps5 things you can actually do
Put last year’s plan next to what you actually did, and mark what emerged without being planned.
Ask people at the edges of your area what is working better for them than intended.
Test every pattern against your mission and your values before you strengthen it.
- Deliberately make viable patterns your course: with resources, clear responsibility and clear words.
Set a framework of objectives and limits, and let the details emerge along the way, except where mistakes would be very costly.
The reflection questions3 questions: What do you do regularly today that was never in any plan?
- What do you do regularly today that was never in any plan?
- Who in your area knows sooner than you do what works, and how do you hear about it?
- Which pattern should you make binding, and which should you end?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- From above: a straight teal line across a surface
- Many small dots set off and veer diagonally toward a mist-blue circle that the line does not touch
- From their tracks a gold trail condenses, part of the straight line fades, and a frame settles around the gold trail
How the principle shows up in practice
Honda
In 1959, Honda sets out to sell big motorcycles in the United States but succeeds with the small motorbike its own people use for errands. The managers recognize the pattern and follow it.
Maria Montessori
In the Casa dei Bambini in Rome, starting in 1907, she develops her method not at her desk but by observing the children. The pattern becomes a system.
The hashtag
In 2007, a user suggests grouping posts on Twitter with the pound sign. The company shows little interest, users do it anyway, and only later does the hashtag become a fixed part of the product.
What pattern do your actions reveal?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 9: Markets and Organizations
Guiding question: How does an organization win in the long run?
Stage 3 of 5: Choose the path
- TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin