The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
Early decisions reinforce themselves. Habit, investment, adoption and rules make a path firmer with every step.
- It does not say
- That the path that prevails is the worse one. In the case of the QWERTY keyboard, the superiority of the alternative has not been proven.
- It does not say
- That paths last forever. Crises and technological leaps can break them.
- It also says
- Stopgaps need a review date, or they turn into permanent solutions.
The explanationOften a path is valuable precisely because many people take it.
This does not mean that every path that has grown over time is a mistake. Often a path is valuable precisely because many people take it.
Which decision are you making right now that nobody will be able to change in three years?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 3 when you overlook it
- Every stopgap you introduce gets an expiration date.
- With new projects, you ask early on what can no longer be changed later.
- You can explain why an existing process still holds up, not just that it has always been done that way.
- Makeshift solutions have been running for years.
- Initial decisions such as the first tool or the first rule are made in passing.
- A switch fails because nobody knew everything that depended on the old path.
The backgroundTradition T6 Business Strategy
- 1985OriginPaul A. David
Clio and the Economics of QWERTY
- 1989OriginW. Brian Arthur
Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
- 1990SupplementedDouglass C. North
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
- Tradition T6TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From Paul A. David’s essay “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY” (1985) and W. Brian Arthur’s model “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events” (1989). Supplemented by Douglass C. North’s application of the idea to institutions (1990).
The research4 sources: 2 case studies, 2 theories · 1985–1990 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
The model of increasing returns is recognized and illustrated by case histories; the claim that paths often lock in worse solutions is disputed.
- 1985Paul A. David
“Clio and the Economics of QWERTY”: the keyboard layout of the 1870s persists because generations of typists were trained on it.
- 1989W. Brian Arthur
“Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events”: with increasing returns, small chance events decide which technology prevails; after that, the market locks in.
- 1990Douglass C. North
“Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance”: applies path dependence to rules and institutions.
- 1990Stan J. Liebowitz and Stephen E. Margolis
“The Fable of the Keys”: disputes that the alternatives to QWERTY have been shown to be superior.
- The principle explains well why something persists, but it does not show that it is worse than the alternative.
- When a switch is truly worthwhile, markets and people often find a way.
- Paths can break, usually through crises or technological leaps.
- The claim that beginnings matter more than they seem is a practical conclusion, not a measured quantity.
Read more: what research shows
Paul A. David popularized the term in 1985, using the QWERTY keyboard as his example. In 1989, W. Brian Arthur supplied the model: when a technology becomes more useful the more people already use it, small, random events at the start decide which of several technologies prevails. After that, the market locks in. In 1990, Douglass C. North applied the idea to institutions and used it to explain why countries hold on to rules that achieve little. In the same year, Stan J. Liebowitz and Stephen E. Margolis countered that in the case of QWERTY, it had not been proven that the alternative was better. What is well founded, then, is how paths arise and why they persist. What is disputed is how often they lead to worse solutions.
The related principles50 Resistance to the New · 77 Network Effects · 78 First Movers and Followers · 86 Unintended Consequences
To go deeper, see 77 Network Effects (the more people take a path, the more valuable and the firmer it becomes) and 78 First Movers and Followers (whoever comes first can lay down the path)
86 Unintended Consequences shows where many paths come from
50 Resistance to the New describes the interests that defend an established path against any switch
Read more: the full text
To go deeper, see 77 Network Effects (the more people take a path, the more valuable and the firmer it becomes) and 78 First Movers and Followers (whoever comes first can lay down the path); 86 Unintended Consequences shows where many paths come from. 50 Resistance to the New describes the interests that defend an established path against any switch.
The action steps5 things you can actually do
When you introduce a stopgap, give it a date on which you will review it, and put that date in the calendar.
- At every beginning, ask: what part of this will be hard to change in three years? That is where care pays off.
- For an entrenched process, map out what depends on it: habits, investments, rules, other departments.
- Distinguish whether a path holds up because it is useful or because it is widespread. Both can be good reasons, but they are different reasons.
Use upheavals such as a fresh start, a move or a crisis to review old paths deliberately.
The reflection questions3 questions: Which stopgap in your area has been running longer than planned, and what depends on it by now?
- Which stopgap in your area has been running longer than planned, and what depends on it by now?
- Which decision are you making this quarter that will be hard to change in three years?
- For which process do you no longer know why it was introduced in the first place?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- A first gold dot draws a slightly curved line around a small circle across a surface of mist-blue dots
- Further dots follow exactly this line until it becomes a strong gold track
- Then the circle fades, a shorter, straight line appears beside it, only dashed in mist-blue, and the dots still stay in the curve
How the principle shows up in practice
QWERTY
The keyboard layout from the 1870s has outlived the typewriter and the computer because generations of typists were trained on it. Whether it is the best remains disputed.
Spain’s time zone
In 1940, Spain sets its clocks to Central European Time as a wartime measure. Working hours, school hours and mealtimes have adapted, and to this day the country lives in a time zone that does not match its location.
The marathon
The 1908 course in London ran from Windsor Castle to the royal box and came to 42.195 kilometers. In 1921, this accidental figure became the standard.
What are you setting in stone right now?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 9: Markets and Organizations
Guiding question: How does an organization win in the long run?
Stage 3 of 5: Choose the path
- TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin