The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
An advantage can be pinned down to individual activities. If you look at them separately, you see where value arises and where there are only costs.
- It does not say
- That each link should be as cheap as possible on its own. A cheaper but slower supplier can weaken the whole chain.
- It does not say
- That the image of the chain fits equally well everywhere. There are separate models for consulting, hospitals or platforms.
- It also says
- The connections between the activities often matter more than any single link.
The explanationWhen sales tells design every day what is selling, something emerges that no department has on its own.
- It is precisely in the connections that the strongest advantage often lies.
- When sales tells design every day what is selling, something emerges that no department has on its own.
- Such linkages are hard to copy because outsiders can hardly see them.
In which step does your value arise, and where does the thread break between two steps?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 3 when you overlook it
- You can name the step in which your area is better than others.
- Feedback also flows backward, for example from customer service to planning.
- Before outsourcing, you check whether the activity carries your advantage.
- Every department improves its own metrics, and orders pile up at the handoffs.
- People management and administration are seen only as costs.
- Outsourcing decisions are made on price, even for the things you are strong at.
The backgroundFrom Michael E. Porter’s book “Competitive Advantage” (1985). · T6 Business Strategy
- 1985OriginMichael E. Porter
Competitive Advantage
- 1996SupplementedMichael E. Porter
What Is Strategy?
- 1998SupplementedCharles B. Stabell and Øystein D. Fjeldstad
Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage
- Tradition T6TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From Michael E. Porter’s book “Competitive Advantage” (1985). Supplemented by his article “What Is Strategy?” (1996) and by the value shop and value network of Charles B. Stabell and Øystein D. Fjeldstad (1998).
The research3 sources: 2 theories, 1 classic · 1985–1998 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
A recognized classic of strategy and a widely used tool; that the linkages carry the strongest advantage is Michael E. Porter’s thesis and has not been measured.
- 1996Michael E. Porter
“What Is Strategy?”: a lasting advantage arises from the fit among many activities.
- 1998Charles B. Stabell and Øystein D. Fjeldstad
“Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage”: the chain fits manufacturing; alongside it stand the value shop (hospitals, law firms, consultancies) and the value network (telephone companies, banks).
- The value chain arose in industry, where goods pass step by step through a plant.
- For consulting, hospitals or platforms, the image fits less well; according to Charles B. Stabell and Øystein D. Fjeldstad, it can even obscure the core of value creation there.
- That the linkages in particular are hard to copy is a plausible inference, but it has not been measured in the sources.
Read more: what research shows
Michael E. Porter described the value chain in 1985 in “Competitive Advantage.” He distinguishes primary activities, which bring a product or service to the customer (inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, service), from support activities (procurement, technology development, human resource management, firm infrastructure). Each one can lower costs or create value. He places a company’s chain within a value system of suppliers, channels and buyers. In 1996, he stressed that a lasting advantage arises from the fit among many activities. In 1998, Charles B. Stabell and Øystein D. Fjeldstad showed that the chain fits manufacturing best. For problem-solving services, they proposed the value shop, and for intermediaries the value network. The value chain is a tool for analysis, not a measured result.
The related principles15 Logistics · 70 Positioning · 73 Core Competence · 74 Valuable, Rare Resources
To go deeper, see 73 Core Competence (the know-how usually sits in a few links of the chain) and 74 Valuable, Rare Resources (linkages are among the things that are hard to imitate)
15 Logistics describes two load-bearing links of many chains
70 Positioning sets the direction: the activities have to fit the chosen position
Read more: the full text
To go deeper, see 73 Core Competence (the know-how usually sits in a few links of the chain) and 74 Valuable, Rare Resources (linkages are among the things that are hard to imitate); 15 Logistics describes two load-bearing links of many chains. 70 Positioning sets the direction: the activities have to fit the chosen position.
The action steps5 things you can actually do
- Draw the chain of your area on a sheet of paper: the steps that bring your work to people and the activities that support them.
For each step, mark whether you are better, equally good or weaker than others there, and note your evidence.
Follow one order from start to finish and measure where it sits idle between two steps.
Set up regular feedback from the back of the chain to the front, and after a month check what it has changed.
- Before any outsourcing, check whether the step carries your advantage. Hand over what others can do better, and keep what sets you apart.
The reflection questions3 questions: In which step of your chain are you demonstrably better than others?
- In which step of your chain are you demonstrably better than others?
- Where does an order sit idle longest between two steps in your area?
- What feedback from the end of the chain are you missing that would improve the first step?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- Five teal circles stand in a row with four mist-blue lines below them as supports
- A gold dot travels from left to right and grows a little at each circle
- At the turning point, fine gold lines stretch between the circles, a dot runs back on an arc from the last circle to the first, and in the final image the dot travels twice as fast and arrives clearly larger
How the principle shows up in practice
Zara
Amancio Ortega links design, manufacturing, logistics and store so closely that new fashions hit the stores within a few weeks.
Disney
A sketch from around 1957 shows films at the center, surrounded by television, the park, music and merchandise, which strengthen one another.
SM Entertainment
In 2011, Lee Soo-man describes his “culture technology,” in which casting, training, production and partners abroad mesh together.
Where does your thread break?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 9: Markets and Organizations
Guiding question: How does an organization win in the long run?
Stage 3 of 5: Choose the path
- TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
- Related principles
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin