The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
Time cannot be recovered. Every unnecessary delay costs strength, money and opportunities, and it does so on both sides.
- It does not say
- That faster is always better. If you are the weaker side, you can win by delaying, and where the situation is unclear, speed can lock in mistakes.
- It does not say
- That fast decision-makers get by with less knowledge. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt found that they used more current information, not less.
- It also says
- A fast first step is of little use if you then slacken and squander your lead.
The explanationHaste, by contrast, cuts out the scrutiny, and if you skip the decisive check, you are fast and wrong.
- So speed does not mean rushing.
- It comes from deciding early, running steps in parallel and limiting yourself to what matters.
- Haste, by contrast, cuts out the scrutiny, and if you skip the decisive check, you are fast and wrong.
Where are you waiting right now when the waiting no longer tests anything?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 3 when you overlook it
- Decisions get a deadline, and they are actually made by then.
- Work steps run in parallel wherever possible.
- Before anything is finalized, there is a check that nobody skips.
- Topics move from meeting to meeting, and the team grows tired.
- Or you rush off as soon as pressure builds, and a check falls by the wayside.
- After a fast start, the pace drops off.
The backgroundFrom Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” (China, probably 5th century BC), above all Chapters 2 and 11. · T2 Eastern Strategy
- 5th c. BCOriginSun Tzu
The Art of War
- 1989SupplementedKathleen M. Eisenhardt
Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments
- 1990SupplementedGeorge Stalk Jr. and Thomas M. Hout
Competing Against Time
- Tradition T2TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” (China, probably 5th century BC), above all Chapters 2 and 11. Supplemented by the management research of Kathleen M. Eisenhardt and of George Stalk Jr. and Thomas M. Hout.
The research3 sources: 1 classic, 1 case study, 1 theory · 1989–1990 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
A small, widely cited study shows that speed need not come at the expense of information; that speed spares everyone exhaustion is the conclusion of a classic.
- 1989Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
“Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments”: in eight microcomputer firms, fast decision-makers used more current information and considered several alternatives at the same time; speed went hand in hand with better performance.
- 1990George Stalk Jr. and Thomas M. Hout
“Competing Against Time”: time is a competitive advantage of companies in its own right.
- Speed is not always right.
- If you are the weaker side, you can win by delaying, as Quintus Fabius Maximus did against Hannibal (Principle 44).
- Where the situation is unclear, acting fast can lock in mistakes, and speed has costs that must be paid later, as the debate about the Treuhand, the agency that privatized East German industry after German reunification, shows.
- Kathleen M. Eisenhardt studied eight firms in a single, very fast-moving industry; the link to performance found there is tentative.
Read more: what research shows
The idea comes from “The Art of War,” attributed to Sun Tzu. In the second chapter, he tallies up the costs of a campaign and concludes, in Lionel Giles’s translation: “Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays.” And: “There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare.” In 1989, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt studied eight companies in the microcomputer industry. The fast decision-makers relied on current information rather than forecasts, considered several alternatives at the same time and sought advice from experienced counselors. There, fast decisions went hand in hand with better performance; she herself calls this evidence tentative. In 1990, George Stalk Jr. and Thomas M. Hout described time as a competitive advantage in its own right.
The related principles13 Culminating Point · 25 OODA Loop · 43 Initiative · 44 Annihilation and Exhaustion
To go deeper, see 25 OODA Loop (if you observe, decide and act faster, you get inside your opponent’s decision cycle) and 43 Initiative (speed is often the means to win it and keep it)
13 Culminating Point shows where an advance that is too fast loses its force
It stands in tension with 44 Annihilation and Exhaustion: sometimes deliberate slowness is the better strategy
Read more: the full text
To go deeper, see 25 OODA Loop (if you observe, decide and act faster, you get inside your opponent’s decision cycle) and 43 Initiative (speed is often the means to win it and keep it); 13 Culminating Point shows where an advance that is too fast loses its force. It stands in tension with 44 Annihilation and Exhaustion: sometimes deliberate slowness is the better strategy.
The action steps5 things you can actually do
Write down which of your decisions have been open for more than four weeks, and ask of each one what the waiting is still testing.
Give every open decision a deadline and a person who will make it.
Look through your processes for steps that run one after another only because it has always been done that way, and run them in parallel where possible.
Before every fast step, decide which one check must not be dropped under any circumstances.
After a quick success, plan the next step right away so that your lead does not peter out.
The reflection questions3 questions: Which decision are you putting off right now, and what is the waiting actually still testing?
- Which decision are you putting off right now, and what is the waiting actually still testing?
- Which window of opportunity in your area will close in the coming months?
- Which check did you last skip under time pressure, and what did that cost?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- A golden frame stands open, with three teal dots in front of it
- While a line of dots runs out like sand, the sides of the frame slowly close in
- One dot waits and fades, one draws a straight line through a small checking ring and reaches the frame before it closes, and the third skips past the ring and dissolves into mist-blue
How the principle shows up in practice
Helmut Kohl, German reunification
In 1990, Kohl used a window of opportunity in Moscow and achieved unity 328 days after the fall of the Berlin Wall, with economic costs that are still debated today.
Uğur Şahin, Özlem Türeci
In 2020, BioNTech developed a vaccine in some 324 days because decisions were made early and many things were done in parallel instead of one after another.
Stern, the Hitler diaries
The case shows how speed turns into haste: in 1983, Stern published before the decisive check and was humiliated 11 days later.
Which waiting time will you cut?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 6: Time and Tempo
Guiding question: When do you act, and how fast?
Stage 3 of 5: Choose the path
- TraditionEastern Strategy
Sun Tzu, Kautilya, the Thirty-Six Stratagems, the Tao Te Ching, Miyamoto Musashi, François Jullien
- Related principles
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin