The principle in detail
Three steps through the principle: grasp it, place it, put it to work. Open each topic on its own.
The core messageCore statement and 3 clarifications
The narrowest point determines the performance of the whole. If you concentrate your effort there, you move the most.
- It does not say
- That the most visible problem is the bottleneck. Where the complaints are loudest is often not where everything is waiting.
- It does not say
- That you should put more strain on the bottleneck. If the bottleneck is people, they need relief, not more work.
- It also says
- Every bottleneck you relieve gives rise to a new one. The search never ends.
The explanationYou find the actual bottleneck, not the loudest one.
The principle calls for three steps.
- You find the actual bottleneck, not the loudest one.
- You use it to the full and subordinate everything else to it.
- Then you expand it and immediately look for the next one, because relieving a bottleneck only moves the narrow point somewhere else.
What is everything else in your world waiting on right now?
The signs3 signs when you heed it · 3 when you overlook it
- You know where work is piling up, and you can explain why.
- Whatever the bottleneck needs takes priority, even if other things have to wait.
- After every improvement, you ask where things are getting stuck now.
- You and your team keep busily improving processes, and the result stays the same.
- The most capable people are the most overloaded, and work piles up in front of them.
- Every decision waits for you.
The backgroundTradition T6 Business Strategy
- 1971–1977OriginWolfgang Mewes
Die kybernetische Managementlehre (EKS)
- 1984SupplementedEliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox
The Goal
- Tradition T6TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
See the tradition on the Origin page
Read more: the full background
From Wolfgang Mewes’s bottleneck-focused strategy, taught as the correspondence course “Die kybernetische Managementlehre (EKS)” (1971–1977). Supplemented by Eliyahu M. Goldratt’s Theory of Constraints, which became known through the novel “The Goal” (1984).
The research3 sources: 2 theories, 1 review · 1971–2009 · with limitations of the research
- weak
- moderate
- strong
For processes in series, the basic statement follows from logic; evidence that the methods work comes mostly from the circles of their originators.
- 1971Wolfgang Mewes
“Die kybernetische Managementlehre (EKS)” (in German; “The Cybernetic Theory of Management”), a correspondence course: concentrating forces on a narrow target group and the need it feels most acutely; the scarcest factor limits development.
- 1984Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox
“The Goal”: a plant manager saves his factory by finding its bottlenecks and increasing their capacity; the Theory of Constraints grows out of this.
- 2009Mahesh Gupta and Doug Snyder
“Comparing TOC with MRP and JIT: a literature review”: there is a lack of case studies linking the introduction of the Theory of Constraints to better financial results.
- The principle assumes that there is one clear bottleneck.
- In complex systems, several narrow points often interact and shift one another.
- Where people are concerned, focusing on the bottleneck can overload precisely those people.
- Sometimes the bottleneck is a rule or a habit that can only be removed by a decision.
- The evidence for EKS comes mostly from the circles of its proponents; the literature review by Mahesh Gupta and Doug Snyder has been accessed only through secondary literature.
Read more: what research shows
In the German-speaking world, the principle goes back to Wolfgang Mewes. He analyzed the behavior of successful business owners and derived from it his bottleneck-focused strategy (German: Engpasskonzentrierte Strategie, EKS): concentrate your forces on a narrowly defined target group and remove the need it feels most acutely. In doing so, he applied the law of the minimum from crop science to companies. Internationally, the idea became known through the novel “The Goal” by Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox, from which the Theory of Constraints with its five steps emerged. For a process in series, the basic statement follows by simple arithmetic: it never delivers more than its narrowest point. By contrast, there is little evidence in the scientific literature that the methods work in organizations.
The related principles06 Center of Gravity · 07 Concentration of Force · 09 Economy of Force · 15 Logistics
Like 06 Center of Gravity, the bottleneck marks the point on which the whole depends, and it tells you where to direct your forces under 07 Concentration of Force
Whatever is not needed there gets only as much as necessary under 09 Economy of Force
Often, as 15 Logistics shows, supply itself is the bottleneck
Read more: the full text
Like 06 Center of Gravity, the bottleneck marks the point on which the whole depends, and it tells you where to direct your forces under 07 Concentration of Force; whatever is not needed there gets only as much as necessary under 09 Economy of Force. Often, as 15 Logistics shows, supply itself is the bottleneck.
The action steps5 action steps: Walk through an important process from start to finish and look at where work piles up.
- Walk through an important process from start to finish and look at where work piles up. That is where the bottleneck is, not where people complain the most.
- Check whether you yourself are the bottleneck. Count how many matters are currently waiting for a decision from you.
- Protect the bottleneck: take everything off its plate that others can do too, and never let it run idle.
- Put time, money and people into expanding the narrowest point first. Other improvements can wait, even if they would be easier.
- After every expansion, ask right away where things are getting stuck now. The next bottleneck is already there.
The reflection questions3 questions: Which matters are currently waiting for a decision from you?
- Which matters are currently waiting for a decision from you?
- What are you working on with great effort without anything changing in the result?
- If you were allowed to improve only one point in your area, which would it be, and how can you tell?
Take your time with one question. Write down your answer – or talk it over with someone you trust.
The picture to rememberThe animation once more, with an explanation
- Five teal frames stand in a row, open to different widths, and mist-blue dots flow from left to right until they pile up in front of the narrowest frame
- Two other frames widen to no effect
- Only when the narrow frame widens in gold do the dots flow through, and right away another frame lights up as the new narrow point
How the principle shows up in practice
Henry Ford, the assembly line
In 1913, Ford targets exactly the assembly step that limits his production. The labor time per chassis falls from around 12.5 hours to 93 minutes.
Florence Nightingale, Scutari
In the Crimean War, most soldiers die not of wounds but of disease. Only hygiene, ventilation and sewage disposal bring the death rate down, and Nightingale makes this bottleneck visible with numbers.
Martin Luther, the September Testament
In 11 weeks, Luther translates the New Testament into German that people can understand. In doing so, he opens the bottleneck that was blocking access to the Bible.
Where is your work piling up?
Get your profile across all 12 groups in about 10 to 15 minutes.
Start the Strategy CheckGroup 2: Forces and Resources
Guiding question: Where do you commit your forces, and how long will they last?
Stage 3 of 5: Choose the path
- TraditionBusiness Strategy
Michael E. Porter, Richard P. Rumelt, Henry Mintzberg, Clayton M. Christensen, W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
- Related principles
Where the 92 principles come from: eight traditions of strategy, from classical war theory to dealing with uncertainty.
More about the originBackground: WEGVISOR’s own selection from the strategy literature · More about the origin